中文
English

Selling 1 billion yuan in six months, Ultraman takes flight, this building block company is going public

2025-01-03

Selling 1 billion yuan in six months, Ultraman takes flight, this building block company is going public

Fixed Focus One

·2024-12-16 09:53

The road to listing for Bruokes has been more tortuous than imagined.

After months of waiting, the 'Chinese version of Lego' is one step closer to being launched.


On December 6th, the Chinese original building block brand Bruke obtained the key to going public through the IPO filing of the China Securities Regulatory Commission. After the expiration of its initial IPO prospectus submitted in May this year, on December 8th, Bruker updated its prospectus and continued to promote its listing on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The latest prospectus shows that Bruker's revenue exceeded 1 billion yuan in the first half of this year, with an adjusted net profit of nearly 300 million yuan.


In 2021, this company was still earning 300 million yuan annually and losing 500 million yuan. However, thanks to the support of the big IP Ultraman and its cost-effective strategy of selling for 19-22 yuan per unit, Bruker achieved a six fold increase in revenue and turned losses into profits in 2024.


If Bruker can successfully go public, it will be a great benefit for both the domestic building block race and the guzi economic race.


However, Bruco's excessive reliance on Ultraman IP, coupled with the company's betting agreement, has cast a fog over its listing prospects. In the future, whether it can further enrich its product line and expand its market while maintaining cooperation with Ultraman IP will become the key to its valuation in the capital market.


Half a year revenue of 1 billion, all thanks to Ultraman

Many people may not have heard of Bruco, but they should have seen their building block products in offline stores such as Toys R Us and Wal Mart.


Bruke was founded in 2014, initially selling traditional early education puzzle building toys such as building block tables and buckets for young children on e-commerce platforms. But this market is highly competitive, with weak brand power, relatively narrow user age groups, and average business conditions. Around 2020, blind boxes and IP became popular, and Bruck also began to transition towards building character toys (block people), encountering the "growth code" Ultraman.




The difference in form between Bruco's building block toys and building block human products


Ultraman first brought it explosive sales growth.


According to the prospectus, Bruker's initial revenue mainly came from building block toys. The turning point occurred in 2021, when Bruker officially signed a contract with the Ultraman IP licensor. In 2022, its Ultraman series products were fully launched. Subsequently, the proportion of income brought by building block people has been increasing year by year, and by the middle of this year, the proportion has approached 98%.


The reason why Building Blocks sell so well is thanks to Ultraman. The Ultraman IP alone contributed over 60% of the revenue in 2023, and by the middle of this year, it has also contributed nearly 60%.


In recent years, Ultraman's sales have continued to increase. Starting from 2022, Bruco will release new series every quarter, and the sales volume of the first quarter of product launch has increased from 140000 pieces in the first series to nearly 8 million pieces in the latest series, a 56 fold increase.


The reason why the Ultraman series has been so popular is not only due to its huge fan base, but also to its pricing strategy of cost-effectiveness. The average selling price of Bruco Ultraman products is between 19 yuan and 22 yuan per unit, which is more favorable for users to try them out.


With the increase in sales, Bruker's revenue has also risen.


From 2021 to 2023, its revenue increased from 330 million yuan to 877 million yuan, and reached 1.046 billion yuan in the first half of this year, exceeding last year's total revenue. If we roughly estimate based on the annual revenue of 2 billion, its revenue has doubled six times in four years.


Ultraman's popularity has brought stronger economies of scale and increased overall gross profit, improving the company's operating conditions. From 2021 to 2022, Bruker suffered consecutive losses, but turned losses into profits in the second half of 2023. In the first half of this year, the adjusted net profit was 292 million yuan. Bruke also saw a sharp increase in gross profit in 2023, with a year-on-year growth of 237.40% to 414 million yuan.


It can be said that Ultraman single handedly increased Bruco's revenue and improved the company's profits. However, a company's excessive reliance on one IP may not necessarily be a good thing.


In addition to Altman, Transformers, Naruto, Little Yellow Man, Baokemeng, Detective Conan, Hatsune Miku, Harry Potter and other hot external authorized IP, Bruco also contributed more than 20% of his income in the first half of this year. But the presence of its own IP, Versatile Bruco and Heroes Unlimited, is weak, with contributions of only 0.9% and 16.2% in the first half of this year.




Ultraman's revenue contribution accounts for the majority


In order to increase the attractiveness of its own IP, Bruke, like other big IPs, has also adopted the form of producing animated films to attract fans and increase the storytelling of its IP. From 2017 to April of this year, Versatile Bruco has released 214 episodes of TV anime, with the story revolving around three main characters: "Bubu", "Lulu", and "Coco". Heroes Unlimited combines well-known Chinese characters such as Sun Wukong, Nezha, Guan Yu, and Zhang Fei with mecha elements, and releases 59 short films.


However, as of mid-2024, Bruker's two proprietary IPs have approximately 5 million global fans, which is not particularly popular compared to other authorized IPs.


This means that Brooke became Ultraman and lost Ultraman.


How big can the building block business be?

Bruco wants to go public, telling the story of the "Chinese version of Lego" to the public. In its prospectus, it claims to be the world's third-largest puzzle toy company, following Bandai and LEGO. However, according to the 2023 GMV calculation, Bruker's 6.3% market share still has a significant gap compared to Lego's 39.5% and Bandai's 35.9%.




Market share of global role-playing toy companies


From the perspective of capital market performance, LEGO has not yet gone public, while Bandai is listed for trading in Tokyo, Japan. Both companies have not entered the international capital market, but their market share and revenue performance (with GMV exceeding 11 billion yuan in 2023) are good.


The two "big brothers" have supported the vast market of building block toys and also driven the popularity of the domestic building block track. In recent years, multiple players have emerged, including brands such as Enlightenment (under Keeppley) and Senbao (under Area-X) that have transformed from contract manufacturers, as well as emerging building block brands such as Bruker, Pinqi, Coincidence Building Blocks, and Wuwei, all of which have obtained financing successively. But currently, there are no domestic building block brands on the market, and the concentration of industry brands is relatively low. The annual GMV performance is also far behind Lego and Bandai.




Compared with LEGO, domestic building blocks have certain gaps in brand strength, purchasing channels, and assembly experience.


In terms of brand positioning, many domestic building blocks in the early stages wanted to take advantage of "Chinese characteristic IP" to embark on a path of differentiation.


For example, Senbao has collaborated with various Chinese cultural IPs, among which the more popular ones are aviation cultural and creative, fleet series, and wandering earth series, emphasizing national pride. In the early period of transformation in 2022, Bruco also cut into China-Chic style and oriental aesthetics, and released the building blocks of the Imperial Palace Taihe Hall and the Tiangong Space Station. However, after seeing the growth potential of Altman IP, China-Chic positioning was not mentioned in the prospectus.


Huahua, a trendy gamer, told Dingjiao One that there might be three reasons for this change: China-Chic style building block players are older and close to the trendy gamers, and their pricing is also biased towards the middle and high-end, but these players have tended to be rational in consumption in the past two years; Under the influence of China-Chic style, themes such as the Forbidden City, Journey to the West, and aerospace have become the standard configuration of building block brands, which are seriously homogeneous and can only compete for price; This type of building block has a relatively large volume, and people are likely to purchase it for assembly or collection purposes. There are also requirements for the placement area of the user's house.


Hua Hua believes that "these factors limit the ceiling of this category


However, pursuing the path of authorizing popular IP addresses is not a one-time solution. On the one hand, because these IPs are not exclusively authorized, it is easy to see the phenomenon of "everyone can buy them everywhere, recognize the IP but not the Bruco". On the other hand, there is uncertainty about whether the enterprise can continue to obtain authorization. The proportion of IP authorization fees in the overall cost has been increasing year by year, reaching 18.5% by the middle of this year.




IP authorization fees are increasing year by year


In terms of purchasing channels, LEGO focuses on experiential offline stores and also has developed online channels. In contrast, domestic building blocks rarely open offline direct stores, and most rely on entering supermarkets or trendy toy collection stores such as Kidswant. Some emerging original building block brands are more willing to plant grass and promote their products through short video channels.


For example, Pinqi once produced a popular product "Astro Boy Perspective Machine Armor", which was priced at more than 299 yuan and became popular in Little Red Book and Tiktok. During the 2021 Tmall Double 11 shopping festival, Pinqi sold 10000 sets of Astro Boy 70th Anniversary commemorative building blocks in pre-sale.


Bruker mainly relies on offline sales volume. According to the prospectus, in 2022, 2023, and the first half of 2024, offline distribution sales accounted for 48.2%, 83.6%, and 91.6% of total revenue, respectively, and these offline outlets are mainly concentrated in second - and third tier cities and below. Today, when offline channels are cold, Brooke has opened flagship stores on JD, Tmall and Tiktok online, but sales of different stores and styles are not stable enough.




Bruke's online channels account for less than 10%


The reason why domestic building blocks have not become popular is that their assembly experience needs to be improved. Several parents have expressed that although the prices are affordable, some domestic building blocks are made of hard materials with insufficient precision, causing hand pain after assembly. Some domestic building blocks not only have simple instructions, but also have poor structural stability, causing children to feel frustrated after assembly due to the "five step walk".


Huahua said that authorized IP has indeed helped some domestic building block brands achieve sales growth and product premium, but in this track, the next stage will be to compete for quality and original research and development capabilities.


From the prospectus, it can be seen that by the middle of this year, Bruker's R&D personnel accounted for about 64% of the total number of employees, of which about 84% were product development teams. But in the eyes of players, domestic building block brands still lack the original appeal like Lego. One example is the bouquet series launched by Lego in the past two years, which was immediately imitated by domestic brands.


Despite the vast prospects of the building block track, Bruker and his peers face some unavoidable challenges, and they also need to answer the question of "how far away are they from Lego".


Bruco, hurry to go public

Bruke's predecessor was Grape Technology, initially targeting educational games based on the STEAM concept, while also developing AR hardware products such as children's tablets and bracelets. Because the market is not yet mature, Bruker has been focusing on building block toys since 2017. Judging from this transformation and the layout of Ultraman IP, Bruker is actually lucky.


It is necessary to mention its founder Zhu Weisong, who is better known as the co-founder of the game company "Youzu Network". He and his partner Lynch pushed for the backdoor listing of Youzu Network in just 5 years, and then Zhu Weisong turned around to establish Grape Technology in 2014.


Zhu Weisong's grasp of IP and operation of capital enabled Bruke to obtain a total of nearly 1.8 billion yuan in three rounds of financing before going public, with investors including well-known institutions such as Junlian Capital, Source Code Capital, Gaorong Capital, and Yunfeng Fund. At the same time, Zhu Weisong also completed his exit from Youzu Network. From 2017 to 2018, Zhu Weisong reduced his holdings by more than 1 billion yuan.


The listing of Bruco in Hong Kong this time can be said to be time sensitive.


One reason is that Bruker has signed a bet with investors that if the listing cannot be completed before June 30, 2026, or if there is a serious breach or resignation of the founder, preferred shareholders can exercise their redemption rights. Based on Bruker's current cash flow, it is highly likely that they will not be able to afford the high cost of redeeming preferred shares. By the middle of this year, Bruco's cash and cash equivalents were only 554 million yuan.


Secondly, the authorization for the large IP signed by Bruker is expected to expire next year, while the authorization for Ultraman IP in China will expire in 2027. In the next 2-3 years, Bru will face pressure to renew multiple core IP licenses upon expiration. If the big IP Ultraman does not renew its contract successfully or its popularity declines by 2027, it will greatly affect Bruco's revenue performance.




Another invisible window period is that the popularity of the Xiaomi economy is gradually declining, and users and capital markets are beginning to calmly and rationally view IP players. Bruco may also face a crisis similar to the blind box craze receding after the listing of Bubble Mart.


The cash out performance of Bruker's management has also added a layer of distrust to the capital market.


In April of this year, one month before Bruker Group submitted its application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Zhu Weisong transferred over 2.35 million ordinary shares of the restructured Bruker through a wholly-owned holding company, cashing out over 75 million yuan.




As early as the angel round investment in 2021, HFHI and BlueCo acquired shares of Bruco Group at a lower subscription price than other shareholders. The prospectus explains that this is because these two institutions acquired the shares held by Zhu Weisong instead of increasing capital to Bruker, through which Zhu Weisong successfully cashed out 120 million yuan.




In addition, Bruker stated in its prospectus that there are no lock up restrictions on the stocks held by Bruker investors. That is to say, once Bruco goes public, these investors can reduce their holdings of stocks at any time, cash out and leave the market.


An investor told 'Dingjiao One' that if the founder cashes out before the company submits its listing application, it may have a negative impact on the company's market trust, investor confidence, company image, internal team stability, and other aspects. If the founder cashes out before going public, it may be interpreted by the market as a lack of confidence in the company's future development, or a concern that going public is only for cashing out rather than for the company's development and expansion of financing channels, thereby affecting investors' trust in the company and its stock price performance.


Considering the generally sluggish performance of toy companies in the Hong Kong stock market, such as the P/E ratio of Caixing Toys being only 3.2 times, the P/B ratio of offline toy retailer Kaizhile being as low as 0.93, and the fact that the prospectus submitted by card company Kayou has expired for 5 months, there is still uncertainty in the market prospects of Bruker.


This article is from the WeChat official account "Dingjiaoone" (ID: dingjiaoone), written by Su Qi, edited by Wei Jia, 36 Krypton is authorized to release.


The viewpoint of this article only represents the author himself, and the 36Kr platform only provides information storage space services.




半年卖10亿、奥特曼带飞,这家积木公司要上市

定焦One·2024-12-16 09:53
布鲁可们的上市之路,曲折比想象中多。

经过数月的等待,“中国版乐高”离上市又近了一步。

12月6日,中国原创积木品牌布鲁可通过证监会IPO备案,拿到了上市的钥匙。继今年5月首次提交上市招股书失效之后,12月8日,布鲁可更新招股书,继续推进港交所主板上市进程。最新的招股书显示,布鲁可在今年上半年营收超10亿元,经调整净利润近3亿元。

就在2021年,这家公司还在年入3个亿、倒亏5个亿。然而,得益于奥特曼这个大IP的加持,以及单个售价19元-22元的性价比策略,布鲁可在2024年实现了收入翻6倍、扭亏为盈的转变。

布鲁可如果能成功上市,对于国产积木赛道和谷子经济赛道来说,都可谓是一大利好。

但是,布鲁可太过于依赖奥特曼IP,加上公司还有对赌协议,为上市前景蒙上了一层迷雾。未来,它能否在维持与奥特曼IP合作的基础上,进一步丰富产品线和拓展市场,成为资本市场对它进行估值的关键。

半年入账10亿,全靠奥特曼

很多人或许没听过布鲁可这家公司,但应该在玩具反斗城、沃尔玛等线下门店,看到过他们家的积木产品。

布鲁可成立于2014年,前期主要在电商平台售卖面向低龄儿童的积木桌、积木桶等传统早教益智积木玩具。但这个市场竞争大、品牌力弱,用户年龄段也相对较窄,经营状况一般。2020年前后,盲盒和IP大火,布鲁可也开始向拼搭角色类玩具(积木人)转型,遇到了“增长密码”奥特曼。

布鲁可的积木玩具和积木人产品形态差别

奥特曼首先为它带来了销量的爆发式增长。

从招股书来看,布鲁可前期的营收主要来自于积木玩具。转折发生在2021年,布鲁可与奥特曼IP授权方正式签约,2022年,其奥特曼系列产品全面上市。随后,积木人带来的收入占比逐年升高,到今年年中,占比已经接近98%。

积木人之所以卖得这么好,靠的就是奥特曼。仅奥特曼这一个IP,2023年就贡献了六成多的收入,到今年年中,也贡献了近六成。

近几年,奥特曼的销量还在进一步提高,从2022年开始,布鲁可每个季度都会发布新系列,产品上市首季度的销量从第一系列的14万件到最新系列的近800万件,涨了56倍。

奥特曼系列之所以能一直这么火,除了有着庞大的粉丝基础之外,还和它的定价走性价比路线有关。布鲁可奥特曼产品的平均售价在19元-22元/单个,这样的价格更利于用户尝鲜。

销量增长之下,布鲁可的营收也随之上涨。

2021年至2023年,其营收从3.30亿元涨到8.77亿元,今年上半年已达10.46亿元,超过去年全年。如果按照全年20亿营收粗略预估,其营收四年翻了6倍。

奧特曼的畅销,带来了更强的规模效应,还拉高了整体毛利,让公司的经营状况得到改善。2021年-2022年,布鲁可连续亏损,2023年下半年扭亏为盈,今年上半年,经调整净利润为2.92亿元。布鲁可也是在2023年毛利猛增,同比增长237.40%至4.14亿元。

可以说,奥特曼凭一己之力拉高了布鲁可的收入、改善了公司的利润。但是,一家公司对于一个IP过于依赖,并不见得是件好事。

除了奥特曼,变形金刚、火影忍者、小黄人、宝可梦、名侦探柯南、初音未来、哈利·波特等大热的外部授权IP,今年上半年也为布鲁可贡献了超两成收入。但其自有IP百变布鲁可和英雄无限的存在感很弱,今年上半年的贡献仅为0.9%和16.2%。

奥特曼收入贡献占大头

为了增加自有IP的吸引力,布鲁可和其他大IP一样也采取了制作动画片吸粉和增加IP故事性的形式。百变布鲁可从2017年到今年4月已推出214集电视动画,故事围绕三个主角“布布”“鲁鲁”和“可可”展开。英雄无限则将孙悟空、哪吒、关羽、张飞等家喻户晓的中国角色与机甲元素相结合,同时推出59集短片。

不过截至2024年年中,布鲁可两个自有IP的全网粉丝约500万,和其他授权IP相比,人气并不算旺。

这意味着,布鲁可成也奥特曼、败也奥特曼。

积木生意,能做多大?

布鲁可想上市,对外讲的是“中国版乐高”的故事。在招股书中,它自称全球第三大拼搭角色类玩具公司,排在万代和乐高之后。但根据2023年GMV计算,布鲁可6.3%的市场份额,与乐高的39.5%和万代的35.9%仍有较大差距。

全球拼搭角色类玩具公司的市场份额

从资本市场表现来看,乐高暂未上市,万代在日本东京挂牌交易,两家都没有进入国际资本市场,但是市场份额和营收表现(2023年GMV均超110亿元)良好。

两个“老大哥”撑起了积木玩具的广阔市场,也带动了国产积木赛道的火热,这几年已经跑出了多个玩家,包括启蒙(旗下Keeppley)、森宝(旗下Area-X)等从代工厂转型而来的品牌,以及布鲁可、拼奇、巧合积木、未及等新兴积木品牌,均先后获得了融资。但目前国产积木赛道还没有跑出上市品牌,行业品牌集中度也较低,年GMV表现也与乐高、万代相差较远。

和乐高相比,国产积木在品牌力、购买渠道、拼装体验上,都有一定差距。

在品牌定位上,很多国产积木在早期,都想借着“中国特色IP”走出差异化之路。

比如森宝曾与各种中国文化IP合作,其中比较火爆的是航空文创、舰队系列、流浪地球系列等,强调民族自豪感。布鲁可在2022年转型早期也切入过国潮风和东方美学,发布了故宫太和殿积木、天宫空间站积木等,但是看到奥特曼IP的增长潜力后,在招股书里没有再提国潮定位。

潮玩玩家花花告诉「定焦One」,这种转变或许有三层原因:国潮风格的积木玩家年龄更高接近于潮玩玩家、定价也偏向于中高端,但这批玩家在近两年的消费偏向理性;在国潮风的影响下,故宫、西游记、航天等主题成为积木品牌的标配,同质化严重,只能拼价格;这一类型的积木体积偏大,人们购买它大概率是为了拼搭或收藏,对于用户的房屋摆放面积也有要求。

花花认为,“这些因素限制了这一品类的天花板。”

但是,走爆款IP授权的路子,也并非一劳永逸。一方面因为这些IP并非独家授权,很容易出现“大家到处都可以买到,认IP不认布鲁可”的现象,另一方面,企业能否持续获得授权,存在不确定性,IP授权费用在整体成本中的比重逐年上升,到今年年中达18.5%。

IP授权费用逐年上升

在购买渠道上,乐高注重体验开设线下直营门店,同时也有着发达的线上渠道。相比之下,国产积木很少开设线下直营门店,大部分都是靠进驻商超或孩子王等潮玩集合店,部分新兴原创积木品牌更愿意在短视频渠道种草和打爆款。

比如拼奇就曾出过一款爆品“阿童木透视机甲”,定价在299元以上,在小红书和抖音火爆出圈。2021年天猫双11期间,拼奇的阿童木70周年纪念款积木预售卖了一万套。

布鲁可主要靠的是线下走量,招股书显示,2022年、2023年及2024年上半年,线下经销销售额分别占总收入的48.2%、83.6%及91.6%,且这些线下网点主要集中在二三线及以下城市。在线下渠道遇冷的今天,布鲁可在线上开设了京东、天猫和抖音旗舰店,但不同店铺和款式的销量都不够稳定。

布鲁可线上渠道占比不足10%

国产积木没能爆火出圈的原因还在于它们的拼装体验感有待提高。多位家长表示,尽管价格实惠,但有的国产积木材质过硬、精度不够,拼完以后手疼,还有的国产积木不仅说明书简单,结构牢固度还差,拼完之后“五步散”,孩子有挫败感。

花花称,授权IP的确帮助一些国产积木品牌做到了销量提升和产品溢价,但这个赛道,下个阶段要比拼的是品质和原创研发能力。

从招股书可以看到,到今年年中,布鲁可研发人员占员工总数的约64%,其中约84%为产品研发团队。但在玩家眼里,国产积木品牌依旧缺乏像乐高一样的原创号召力,其中一个例子是,乐高近两年推出的花束系列,一经推出就遭到了国产品牌的“模仿”。

尽管积木赛道前景广阔,但是布鲁可和同行们共同面临着一些不可回避的挑战,它们也需要回答“自己离乐高还有多远”这个问题。

布鲁可,着急上市

布鲁可的前身是葡萄科技,最初瞄准的是基于STEAM理念的益智早教游戏,同时兼做AR硬件产品,如儿童平板电脑、手环等。因为市场尚未成熟,2017年之后开始专注于积木玩具,从这次转型和奥特曼IP的布局来看,布鲁可其实算是幸运的。

这就不得不提到它的创始人朱伟松,他更被人熟知的身份是游戏公司“游族网络”的联合创始人。他与合伙人林奇,仅用5年时间就推动游族网络借壳上市,随后,朱伟松在2014年转身成立葡萄科技。

朱伟松对IP的把握和对资本的运作,让布鲁可在上市前拿到了合计近18亿元的3轮融资,投资方包括君联资本、源码资本、高榕资本、云锋基金等知名机构。同时,朱伟松也完成了从游族网络的退出,2017年至2018年,朱伟松减持的金额超过了10亿元。

此次布鲁可赴港上市,可谓时间紧迫。

一是因为布鲁可与投资方签了对赌,如果未能在2026年6月30日前完成上市,或出现创始人严重违约、离职等情况,优先股股东可以行使赎回权。以布鲁可目前的现金流来看,大概率无力承担优先股赎回的高额代价。到今年年中,布鲁可的现金及现金等价物仅有5.54亿元。

其次,布鲁可签约的大IP的授权,不少将在明年到期,奥特曼IP在中国的授权将于2027年到期。在未来2-3年内,布鲁将面临多个核心IP授权到期续约的压力。其中奥特曼这个大IP如果到2027年不续约成功或IP热度下降,将极大影响布鲁可的营收表现。

另外一个隐形的窗口期是,谷子经济的热度逐渐有下降的趋势,用户和资本市场开始冷静理性看待IP玩家,布鲁可也可能面临泡泡玛特上市后盲盒热退潮一样的危机。

布鲁可管理层的套现表现也让资本市场增添了一层不信任感。

今年4月,在布鲁可集团向港交所递表的一个月前,朱伟松通过全资持股公司转让了重组后的布鲁可超过235万股普通股,套现超过7500万元。

早在2021年的天使轮投资中,HFHI和BlueCo以低于其余股东的认购价,获得了布鲁可集团的股份。招股书解释,这是因为这两家机构是收购了朱伟松手中的股份而非向布鲁可增资的方式,借此朱伟松成功套现1.2亿元。

另外,布鲁可在招股书中规定,布鲁可投资者持有的股票没有禁售限制。也就是说,一旦布鲁可上市,这些投资方可以随时减持股票,套现离场。

有投资人告诉「定焦One」,创始人在公司递交上市申请前进行套现,可能会对公司的市场信任度、投资者信心、公司形象、内部团队稳定性等方面产生负面影响。“如果创始人在上市前套现,可能会被市场解读为对公司未来发展缺乏信心,或者担心上市只是为了套现而不是为了企业发展和扩展融资渠道,进而影响投资者对公司的信任度和公司的股价表现”。

考虑到港股玩具公司股价的普遍低迷表现,比如彩星玩具市盈率仅3.2倍,线下玩具零售商凯知乐的市净率低到0.93,以及卡牌公司卡游提交的招股书已过期5个月,布鲁可的市场前景还存在不确定性。

本文来自微信公众号“定焦”(ID:dingjiaoone),作者:苏琦,编辑:魏佳,36氪经授权发布。


Read0
share
Write a Review...
推荐文章
1  /  168